USA-Political-Funding

Page 1 of 2

Allocation of federal political funds for each U.S. congressional district and state.

U.S. Congressional Districts’ Representative election files are written for each district’s election. District’s prior election files are expired.

U.S. Senatorial Election Files are written for each state’s U.S. Senate election. No more than two U.S. Senatorial Election Files can exist for any U.S. state; (There is only one junior and one senior U.S. senator representing each state). All other than the state’s two U.S. Senatorial election files are expired election files.

An Election file has a record for each individual that received any of the election’s cast votes. An individual’s election record contains the individual’s name and the proportion of the election’s votes the individual received. The election records also indicate the title of the elective office that was filled and the date of the election.

On the second day of January all individual’s master federal funded political account, (master FFPA, ** see note), are emptied into their related slave accounts. Then all master FFPA s, FFPA records and all empty slave FFPA records are expired.

On the third day of January current year’s cost of living adjusted sums of dollars for political purposes are allocated for U.S. congressional districts and an equal sum is allocated for U.S. states. The sum for districts are equally divided and further allocated among the districts. The sum for states are equally divided s and further allocated among the states.

Amounts from each U.S. Congressional District’s current year’s allocated political funds are further allocated among the district’s minor U.S. Congressional Representative candidates.

* A minor candidate has received less tha 5% of the votes cast for the elected office within the election. All other of the election's candidates are not minor candidates.

The proportion of the district’s political funds that is further allocated to a minor candidate is equal to the individual’s proportion of votes received in the district’s last U.S. Congressional District Representative election.

After a U.S. Congressional District’s current political funds have been allocated to all of the district’s current minor candidates, the remainder of the district’s current political funds are equally divided and further allocated to all of the district’s other current congressional representative candidates.

Amounts from each U.S. state’s current year’s allocated political funds are further allocated to the state’s minor U.S. Senatorial candidates. The total proportion of the state’s political funds that is further allocated to a minor U.S. Senatorial candidates are equal to half of the individual’s total proportions of cast votes received and recorded in both of the state's active U.S. Senatorial election files. (There are no more than two active state election files for each state).

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Page 2 of 2

Allocation of federal political funds for each U.S. congressional district and state.

After U.S. state's current political funds have been further allocated to all of the state's senatorial current minor candidates, the remainder of the state's current political funds are equally divided and further allocated to all of the state's other current senatorial candidates.

After all of the currently allocated political funds are completely further allocated, a new set of FFPA master and slave records are written from each record of the active U.S. Congressional District's Representative and U.S. Senatorial election files. All of the new slave record amounts are zero.

Unsuccessful election candidates are requested to name their designated heir in case of any incapacity to administer their own FFPA’s. In such cases the inheriting individual’s name followed by “ –inheritor” replaces the names of the replaced individuals’ within the titles of their FFPAs, FFPA records and election records. Those appointed to replace office holders inherit the replaced office holder’s accounts and records. The replacing names' of accounts and record titles of appointed rather than inheriting ijndividuals are followed by the term " - appointed" and their portion of cast notes are indicated as "100%".

Wireless and cable communication are subject to some federal regulation but (due to recent Supreme Court decisions regarding free speech), wealth’s access to broadcasting time is supreme.
** FFPA:
Purchases of broadcasting time through FFPAs, (federally financed political accounts) has advantages not granted to purchasers of electronic communication paid by any other sources. Purchasing such communication through master FFPAs are never disadvatagous and generally more advantageous than purchases through slave FFPAs.

Refer to the following discussion concerning purchases of political advertising and educational time or space through FFPAs.

//////////////////////////////////////

Page 1 of 2; Purchases of political advertising and educational time or space through FFPAs.

Other than federally allocated and deposited funds, no other funds may be deposited or mingled within a master federal funded political account, (FFPA). Other than federally allocated and deposited funds transferred from a related master FFPA, no other funds may be deposited or mingled within a slave FFPA.

Funds from FFPAs may not be used to for commercial purposes or for soliciting any sales, trades or contributions and they may only be spent for services performed within USA’s borders. Sellers of time or space paid for through FFPAs may not favor an FFPA over any other FFPA, except in cases of other federal law or regulation’s superior jurisdiction. Sellers or controllers of time or space may not favor non FFPA entities or less favor FFPA purchasers or FFPA offerers to purchase time or space.

Master FFPAs may only be used to pay for political advertisement or educational electronic communication time or space but funds from a master FFPA may be transferred into its related slave FFPA. Slave account purchases are not limited to electronic communication. Slave accounts can pay for any time or space within any media.

Wireless and cable communication are subject to some federal regulation but (due to recent Supreme Court decisions regarding free speech), wealth’s access to broadcasting time is now supreme.

Purchases of electronic communication time or space through FFPAs, (federally financed political accounts) have advantages not granted to all other purchases of time or space paid by any other sources. Purchasing electronic communication time through master FFPAs is generally more advantageous than purchases through slave FFPAs.

////////////////////////////////////////

Page 2 of 2; Purchases of political advertising and educational time or space through FFPAs.

There are cost of living adjusted capped rates for times purchased through FFPAs. These price caps would be affected by:
More or less desirable days and time of day;
Wireless or cable, TV or internet, number of homes served or Nielson ratings?

There’s maximum number of days notice that a seller may require for offers to purchase electronic communication time or space through an FFPA. That maximum will decrease as the number of days until the next election approaches.

A seller or operator of electronic communication upon common carriers may not refuse an offer to purchase time without good cause. That electronic communication’s time and channel upon a wireless or a cable common carrier is otherwise committed to a non FFPA is not valid cause to refuse an offer for purchasing the time. [This is by far the most controversal "entitlements" for FFPA purchassers. In these cases FFPA absolutely trumphs wealth.] There will be a federal arbitration procedure for time contested between FFPAs.

Although the Supreme Court’s decisions have supported divine rights of wealth, (if the court upholds these FFPA advantageous), a dollar of federal funding will purchase much more electronic communication than a dollar from any other source. The price caps for FFPA purchases will have no effect upon smaller electronic communication providers; it will be costly for the wealthier corporations. This is justified due to their profiting more from their use of public airways and running their cables through public right-of-ways. Electronic communication, much more than any other method influences voters.